Tourism and Rizal Park free essay sample

Rizal Park as everybody seen it today is the product of years of painstaking work by thousands of unknown citizens who gave of their time and their labors to create something of beauty where there was nothing but yawning wilderness in the very heart of the premier city. Its continued cleanliness and order is a tribute to the people who use it more than to those who tend to it. Here is a park that is used, loved and nurtured by the people who saw it shape up from nothing (http://rizalpark. nationalparks. ph/main. htm, October 9, 2013). Tourist attractions can be natural or man-made. The history and culture of a place are also very important attractions that enhance the natural and man-made attractions found in the place. The history of a place is felt through visits to old buildings and churches, and other places of historical value. Activities for tourist support the tourist attractions that a destinations offers. We will write a custom essay sample on Tourism and Rizal Park or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page These beef up experience of visitors beyond appreciating the attractions. Learning how to do some crafts and more memorable experience for tourists (Libosada and Bosangit, 2007). Rizal Park is in the heart of Manila, a historical mark of Patriotism of the Filipino’s. The park has beautiful gardens, facilities and can be used as venue for a particular event. The Park is considered as the favorite place of tourists both local and foreign to stroll around. This park is truly a sanctuary of all people in different walks of life (National Parks Development Brochure). Background of the Study It has been said that the Philippine tourism industry is in a state of transition, a slow yet remarkable process of changing landscape. For one, since the park host to Jose Rizal’s execution and through the years, been able to evolve from one historic venue of martyrdom to a national park. Rizal Park is one of the largest parks in Southeast Asia, it has an area of 58 hectares which runs from Taft Avenue up to the walls of the famous Manila Bay. It was known as the Bagumbayan field during the Spanish era since this was where the Filipino-Moslems took refuge after the Spaniards occupied Intramuros in 1571. It was also called Luneta, which means Little Moon. For 74 years, it was used as an executing ground by the Spaniards for Filipino rebels and mutineers. By 1902, Daniel Bumham, architect and city planner chose Bagumbayan as the site of the proposed American government center. He designed a U-shaped composition of buildings, but only three were constructed. The Executive House, the Department of Tourism building, and the Department of Finance building. It acquired its present name Rizal National Park in dedication to the Philippine national hero, Dr. Jose P. Rizal, whose mortal remains were interred in the cornershore of the Rizal Monument in 1912 (http://rizalpark. nationalparks. ph/main. htm). Setting of the Study â€Å"Luneta† came from the French word Lunette which means a crescent-shaped fort, it was the site of â€Å"La Calzada,† the social hub of Manila’s elite. It was also used by the Spaniards by as an execution grounds for rebels and activists, Namely Dr. Jose P. Rizal and his compatriots the three friars, called Gomburza. The park is divided into three sections beginning with the 16-hectare Agrifina Circle adjoining Taft Avenue, where the Department of Tourism and the National Museum of the Filipino People (formerly the Department of Finance) are located; followed by the 22-hectare park proper that extends down to Roxas Boulevard; and terminating at a 10-hectare open field across Roxas Boulevard fronting Quirino Grandstand along the Manila Bay. The 31-meter Philippine flagpole is called kilometer zero, because it is where the distance of the countrys towns and cities is measured from. Just beside the flagpole is Rizal monument, where foreign leaders attend wreath-laying ceremonies during state visits (National Parks Development Brochure). Figure 1 The Map of the Philippines Showing the Strategic Location of Manila Figure 2 Map of City of Manila Figure 3 Map of Rizal Park FIGURE 4 Paradigm of the Study Conceptual Framework The study is focused on the Development of the new Rizal Park and its effects on the local and foreign tourists’ arrivals. The researchers will identify the factors that influenced tourists to visit the destination. The result of this study will help promote the Rizal Park as the Face of the Philippine Ecotourism. This will give them knowledge on how to preserve and improve the destination to attract more local and foreign tourists. It will also give them accurate insights about the effects of the development of the park to tourists. This would be a big help in knowing the evaluation regarding the location, facilities, amenities, safety, security, and affordability, so that the people responsible on governing Rizal Park will be able to know the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threat of the particular site. Paradigm of the Study The paradigm illustrates the conceptual framework of the study, which illustrates how the specific objectives will be answered. This study will tend to find out about the Development of the new Rizal Park and its effects on the local and foreign tourists’ arrivals. Statement of the Problem This study aimed to determine the development of the new Rizal Park and its effects on the local and foreign tourist’s arrivals. Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions: 1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of: 1. 1 Age 1. 2 Gender 1. 3 Nationality 1. 4 Occupation 1. 5 Frequency of visit 1. 6 Purpose of visit and 1. 7 Educational Attainment? 2. What were the perceptions of the local and foreign tourists on the development of the new Rizal Park in terms of: 2. 1 Architectural Design 2. 2 Facilities 2. 3 Preservation of History 2. 4 Safety and Security and 2. 5 Attractions? 3. What were the perceived effects of the development on the new Rizal Park in terms of: 3. 1 Modernization 3. 2 Governance and 3. 3 Increase Tourists Arrivals/ Frequency of visit? 4. What are the frequent Problems encountered by the foreign and local tourists within the vicinity of the Park? 4. 1 Cleanliness 4. 2 Security 4. 3 Entertainment 4. 4 Food and Beverage Establishment (refreshments area) 4. 5 Comfort Rooms and Washrooms Assumption of the Study The study assumed that all respondents answered the questionnaire honestly and to the best of their abilities. It further assumed that the effect of the development on Rizal Park were accurate representation of Tourists perceptions. Hypothesis of the Study There is no significant relationship between foreign and local tourists’ arrival based on the development of the new Rizal Park. The developments made by the governing party led the destination to its growth or decline in the number of tourist’s arrivals. Significance of the Study The findings of this study will benefit the following: Tourism Students. It can be used by CEU and other educational establishments could be given accurate report on the account of the Rizal Park as an important asset and as an expressive tourist attraction. They could be used as future reference especially to those who would make a research in line with this study. It aimed to give them better appreciation of the features and significance of the country’s national park. Local and Foreign Tourists. It as a place for fun, relaxation and recreation. Tourism Industry. It study may provide insights to the tourism industry in their promotion of the Rizal Park as an essential and meaningful tourists destination in the Philippines. National Parks Development Committee (N. P. D. C. ). This study will provide the governing party of the Rizal Park on the effects of the development made. It will also give them insights on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threat of the Rizal Park. Scope and Limitation of the Study This study was focused on the development of the new Rizal Park and its effects on the local and foreign tourists’ arrivals. The Rizal Park and Monument was built on commemoration on the National Hero who gave his life for the liberation of their country, Dr. Jose Rizal. The park is indeed a sanctuary to people from all walks of life. It comprises world class sculptures, historical markers, beautiful gardens, facilities for photo and exhibits, event venues, form of entertainment and a dancing fountain. Both local and foreign tourists were be considered to determine the effect of the development of the new Rizal Parks to tourists. Its focus shall include social and economic development in the country which the Park has contributed. On how the modernization, history, security, governance affects the number of tourists arrivals. More importantly, how it influenced the development of tourism industry in the Philippines by including the Rizal park as one of the most notable tourist destination. Definition of Terms For better understanding the following are enumerated: Arrival. It is the number of people who arrive at a destination (Goeldner, 2009). Culture. It refers to the totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought that are characteristic of the destination population (Goeldner, 2006). Cultural Heritage. It is defined as monuments and groups of buildings or structures of outstanding universal value from the point of view of history, art or science, and outstanding universal value from historical, aesthetic, ethnological or anthropological points of view. (UNESCO Convention for the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, 1972) Development. It is mentioned as the modification of the environment to whatever degree and the application of human, financial, living, and nonliving resources to satisfy human needs and improve the quality of human life (Goeldner, 2009) Tourism. It comprises the activities of persons travelling to and staying in places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year, for leisure business, and other purposes (Goeldner, 2009). Tourism Industry. It is a composite of entities, both in the public and private sectors, engaged in the planning, development, marketing, sales, operations and evaluation of destinations, products and services that caters to the needs of the travelers (Goeldner, 2009). Tourists. It refers to the people who visit the park. They are travelers who visit a destination or attraction which lasts for more than twenty-four hours and requires lodging facilities (Goeldner, 2009). CHAPTER 2 Review of Related Literature and Studies This chapter presents a review of Related Literature and Studies both foreign and local. Foreign Literature Much media attention has focused on the tourism industry on the natural environment. Thus, many countries consider the effects of developing a tourism destination to its surroundings. In fact, some consider leaving an area untouched, to be marketed as tourism destination (Swarbrooke, 1999). Lundberg (1990) viewed that developing tourist destination will help to attract tourist. This will be a cause of an increasingly economic status of a region â€Å"A Grand Canyon†, natural wonder that is, cannot attract visitors unless there is access by road, air or water. Relatively few visitors will make the trip unless there are hotels and motels or even overnight accommodations for RV’s and tents (Lundberg, 1990). As stated by Goeldner and Ritchie (2006) heritage attractions (such as historic sites) and prehistoric and archaeological sites (such as the ancient monuments of Egypt, Greece, Israel, Turkey, Indonesia, India, Mexico, and Peru) also have appeal for those inspired to learn more about contemporary and long-vanished civilizations. Parks, both private and government enterprises operate various kinds of parks, including amusements parks. National parks are often very important parts of a nation’s or state’s tourism. In some countries (such as certain countries in Africa), national parks are their primary attractions. Historic sites have always been popular attraction for both domestic and international travellers. Traveller’s tend to engage in multiple activities when they travel, Thirty percent of the historic/cultural places travellers said this activities where the primary motive for the trip (Goeldner and Ritchie, 2006). International tourism encompasses the activities of visitors who make temporary visit across international borders, outside their usual environment, and remain for more than 24 hours. The primary purpose of travel can be leisure, visiting friends and relatives, business convention or meeting health, education, religion or sport, as tourism involves both consumption and purchase of goods and services by tourists; its impact can affect many sectors, such as transport and tour operators, accommodation attractions and tourism related business (Mowen, 2009). Government policies in progressive and enlightened nations encourage travel, particularly domestic travel, as means of acquainting people with other parts of their country and building appreciation for the homeland. The presence of visitors in a country affects the living patterns of indigenous people (Manila Bulletin, 1992, p. 22) This study is related to the present study because every year there is always a development done in the society, like the development and innovation of a certain area as a tourist attraction. Rizal Park is a historic place that must be maintained and sustained. Local Literature Rizal Park has transformed into a radiant fulfillment of what the Filipino hero himself might have dreamt; a project realized through the awakened and concerted efforts of the people, and without government aid. Just a famous as the man after whom it is named, the park’s common pride that the park can be a living a symbol of the people’s unity and aspiration. It is not just a beautiful park. It is Philippines history captured from the past and preserved for all to see, read and enjoy. Never before have concerts, fashion shows, ballet, and cultural offerings, all of high quality, been brought within the people’s reach as it is now made available to them at Rizal Park. Likewise a symbol of the continuity of purpose, the Park is an edifice wherein each administration has put in stone evidencing its beliefs in and support for the project from the far-seeing administration who marked out the reserved area and resisted attempts to reduce its size; to President Quirino who initiated the construction of the grandstand to President Macapagal who laid the more concrete plans for its modernization, and now to President Marcos and Major Antonio J. Villegas who gave official support to plans that have metamorphosed the park into a thing of matchless beauty. This relates to the present study because it tells about the history of improvement of Rizal Park. This shows the changes during different administrations. This study gives ideas on what they can do to improve Rizal Park today (Altomonte, 2003). Villafuerte, explained that the extent of the impact of tourism and determined by the nature of the main tourist facilities and their attractiveness to the general public. The volume of visitors, the intensity of their expenditures in the country in the degree to which their spending reticulates increasing the number and variety of expenditure outlets attracts more tourists. The extent to which this expenditure recirculates through the economy is the so-called effect. This is related to the present study because it tackles about the impact of tourism in a certain place, like the impact of the tourist arrival in Manila, because Rizal Park is one of the tourist attractions. The attractiveness of the park’s facilities and service increases the volume of visitors (Villafuerte, 1990). According to Philippine (Republic) National Economic and Development Authority, The Philippines will have already established itself as a leading tourist destination area due to intensive promotions and marketing abroad. As a result of the ASEAN complementation program, it is expected that the country will have been included in several multiplier tour packages. As such tourist arrivals will reach unprecedented levels accounted for mainly by sponsors and participants of international conventions as well as by tourist from nontraditional markets that travel for leisure, recreation and business purpose. However, the volume of foreign tourist arrivals will have stabilized in line with the absorptive capacity of the economy and in specific tourist markets that the Philippines will have catered to; tourist arrivals will have assumed a more balanced nationality profile. In the process, tourism will have developed a national sense of pride either through domestic tourism as more Filipinos see the beauty of their country or through foreign tourist as more visitors to appreciate and take pleasure in indigenous Filipino attractions (Manila Bulletin, 1990, p. 46). This study is related to the present study because the writer is concerned about tourism arrival and to improve the tourism destination to attract the foreign and local tourist in the Philippines. Foreign Studies Authors of â€Å"International Urban Traveler,† as the globalization process accelerates and the volume of tourism markets increases, it has become ever more important to understand international travelers with regard to their patterns, perceptions and preferences based on the inbound destination lifecycle model as the conceptual framework for analyzing international travelers. This study shows the implications of tourism industry to government level and company level. In relation to this study, it is true that international travelers perceived more intangible attributes such that they like to know more about the history of the place. Like the Rizal Park, foreign and local tourists visit the place because they are curious, they find peace and relaxation, and at the same time they appreciate its historical and cultural value while learning from it (Kon, 2001). If they develop a tourist destination, it will help to attract tourists. This may cause an increase in economic status of religion, viewed that developing tourist destination which will help to attract tourists. This will be a cause of an increase in economic status in religion, â€Å"A Grand Canyon†, a natural wonder, cannot attract visitor if there is a poor access. But if there are at least hotels and motels or overnight accommodations for RV’s and tents. The visitor paying 300USD a day at a resort or hotel expect a great deal more; perhaps sand beach. The Lundberg book is related to this study because this tackles about the possible effect if they improve a tourist destination. The only difference is that Rizal Park is a man-made attraction and there a lot of hotel in the area (Lundberg,1990). Intermediate Leisure and Tourism, the National Parks are particularly aware of the negative impacts can have on the environment. Although they recognize that tourism is important to local economy, their aim is not to try to stop visitor. It is to help reduce their negative impact on the environment. Unlike national parks, built attractions are usually set up especially for tourists. Even so, the surroundings area may suffer because access roads cannot cope with the added volume of traffic. The result is huge for frustrating traffic jams which pollution and affects both tourist and local people. Unless they are carefully designed, new building house attraction can also spoil the Existing landscape or built environment (Chan,1998). This study is related to the present research because this gives to the entire tourist, like the problems that they may encounter as they visit the places, like traffic, pollution and crowd in Manila. Add on to that, they will also be aware of the do’s and don’ts as they visit the place. Local Studies Rizal Park, as is seen today is the product of years of dedicated and painstaking effort by thousands of known and unknown citizens who gave of their time and their labors to create beauty where there was nothing but yawning wilderness in the very heart of our premier city. Here is a park that is used, loved and nurtured by the people who saw it shape up from nothing. Now, Rizal Park is administered by the National Parks Development Committee an attached agency of the Department of Tourism. Funds for the improvements of parks are generated from government appropriations and donations from government and nongovernment sectors. The statues in this park are more than a permanent tableau to this important page in Filipino history. It has a vibrant historical significance which should be passed thru generations to generations for everyone to broaden this educational and cultural horizon and improve the feeling of self-worth that would create a favorable worldwide image of the country’s national park. (Department of Tourism, Annual Report, (Manila Bulletin,1993, p. 39). Every exclusive barrier dignitaries visiting Manila gets his first glimpse of the country’s history by strolling along the park, making a floral offering to the Rizal monument, looking at the significant spots that dot area. Indeed, Rizal Park has blossomed into a radiant fulfillment of what the Filipino hero himself might have dreamed. A project realized through the sincere, cooperative efforts of many citizens and through the support of the different administration for all time. Through this study everybody can compare Rizal Park from what it was before and, what it is today. (Myra F. Gatus, The Perception of Foreign and Local Tourist on the Facilities and Services of the Rizal Park: Its Impact to Tourist Arrival in Metro Manila). Fort Santiago, formerly an old Spanish garrison, is now a very pretty park from its rich history. Like Rizal Park, its serves as a historical `shrine of Dr. Jose Rizal, who was detained the prior to this execution in 1896. Fort Santiago contains Rizal’s memorabilia together with his last poetry â€Å"Mi Ultimo Adios. † Rizal’s last poetry can be found in an engraved that makes the exact spot where he died in Rizal Park. (The Rizal Park Walking Tour, DOT and NPDC brochure. ) Synthesis The Rizal Park is a flagship of freedom and courage as numerous political rallies, oath takings, and national events held in the area. There is no other place in Manila where one can find serenity and diversity than Rizal Park. More than just a place to stroll around the park is indeed a sanctuary to all people. CHAPTER 3 Method and Procedures This chapter includes the methodology of the study, subject with study, sampling technique, procedure of data gathering and the statistical treatment used in this study. Method of Research The descriptive method of research was used in this study. Descriptive method of research is a fact-finding study with the adequate and accurate interpretation of the findings. It describes what currently exist, like current conditions, causes and effects relationship, trends, situations and interpretations of such data, since the study deal with the assessment of existing amenities and services concerning the possible alternatives towards a more vibrant Rizal Park. (Calderon, J. F. and Gonzales, Expectacion C. , 1993. Methods of Research and Thesis Writing. Mandaluyong City: National Bookstore, Inc. , p. 62) Descriptive research or study is primarily concerned it finding out â€Å"what is†, in an investigation. It seeks to see a holistic picture of a study by gathering data that describe events and then organizes, tabulates, depicts, and describes the data collection. (Mildred B. Go et. al. , 2012. Business and Research Writing Manual, Centro Escolar University. , p. 27) Sampling Technique The researchers used the simple random sampling technique that is a method of selecting a sample from a statistical population so that every sample that could be selected has a predetermined probability of being selected. It is a subset of individuals chosen from a larger set of population. The technique is chosen because each member of the total population under the study has the same chance or equal opportunity of being selected. The Criteria in Choosing of Respondents were: 1. The respondents must be of legal age. 2. Respondents who has visited Rizal Park. 3. The respondents are capable of understanding the questionnaire given to them. 4. Respondents must be foreign and local tourist. 5. A respondent knows every part or corner of Rizal Park. Subject of the Study The subjects of the study are mainly local and foreign tourists who visited Rizal Park. These one hundred nine (109) are chosen to be the respondents study. They were randomly selected by the researchers. Subject is defined as a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures or someone who is an object of investigation (Webster’s Dictionary Special Encyclopedic Edition, Springfield, Massachusetts, 2007). Validation of Questionnaire The questionnaire was further scrutinized to correct its content validity before distributing to the final respondents. The researchers constructed the questionnaire with the sample of thirty (30) people will be picked randomly to serve as a sample of the whole population. And the one hundred nine (109) is for the population. Procedure of Data Gathering The researchers prepared a set of questionnaires in gathering the data from the respondents. The questionnaire consists of five parts. The first part of the questionnaire included the profile of the respondents such as: age, gender, nationality, occupation, frequency of visit, purpose of visit and civil status. The second part perception of Rizal Park. The third part perceived effects of the development of Rizal Park. The fourth part frequency problem of Rizal Park. Questionnaires were distributed randomly to the visitors of Rizal Park. The respondents were given an ample time to answer. The accomplished forms were then collected afterwards, on Part V, includes the interpretation of data gathered, which are as follows Statistical Treatment of Data The data gathered, were tailed, analyzed, interpreted and recorded using the following: 1 Frequency and Percentage was used for problem 1. It was used to tabulate the data, with as corresponding frequency for each category and it described the distribution of scores to be obtained. These frequencies were converted to the rate. Percentage to make quantitative comparisons of the profile of the respondents. (Rosita De Guzman Santos et al. Ph. D. , Statistics, Manila: CEU 2010, pp. 29-62) 2 Weighted Mean of the total number of the respondents and give interpretation to the mean of the respondents answer. The researcher’s purpose for this is to give each data their proper degree of importance. Legend: ResponseLikert Scale Strongly Agree 4. 50-5. 0 Agree 3. 50-4. 49 Minimally Agree 2. 50-3. 49 Disagree 1. 50-2. 49 Strongly Disagree . 50-1. 49 CHAPTER 4 Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data The chapter is principally concerned with the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data gathered from the respondents. This also contains the presentation of data in tabular forms with its correspondent’s interpretation. In this chapter, the data collected was based on the result of the questionnaire distributed by the researchers to local tourist as the respondents of this study. Based on outcome of the data gathered the following tables are enumerated: 1. Profile of Respondents 1. 1 Age. Table 1 shows that most of the Respondents’ age belongs to; 18-22 years old has a frequency of 53 or 48. 62% followed by 23-27 years old with a frequency of 13 or 11. 93%, 28-32 years old with a frequency of 11 or 10. 09%, 33-37 years old with a frequency of 10 or 9. 17%, 38-42 years old with a frequency of 5 or 4. 59%, 43-47 years old with a frequency of 7 or 6. 42%, 48-52 years old with a frequency of 5 or 4. 59%, 53-57 years old with a frequency of 1 or 0. 92%, and 58-62 years old which got a frequency of 3 or 2. 75% and 63 years old and above frequency of 1 or 0. 92%. TABLE 1 Respondents’ Age Age F % 18-22 years old 53 48. 62 23-27 year old 13 11. 93 28-32 years old 11 10. 09 33-37 years old 10 9. 17 38-42 years old 5 4. 59 43-47 years old 7 6. 42 48-52 years old 5 4. 59 53-57 years old 1 0. 92 58-62 years old 3 2. 75 63 years old and above 1 0. 92 Total 109 100% 1. 2 Gender. Table 2 shows that most or 57. 80% of the respondents are male, 42. 20% are female. TABLE 2 Respondents’ Gender Gender F % Female 63 57. 80 Male 46 42. 20 Total 109 100% 1. 3 Nationality. Table 3 shows that majority of the respondents’ nationality belong to Filipino has of 70 or 64. 22% followed by American of 15 or 13. 76%, Korean of 11 0r 10. 09%, Chinese of 8 or 7. 33% and Japanese/Papua new guinea which got of 5 or 4. 58%. TABLE 3 Respondents’ Nationality Nationality F % Filipino 70 64. 20 American 15 13. 76 Korean 11 10. 09 Chinese 8 7. 33 Japanese/Papua New Guinea 5 4. 58 Total 109 100% 1. 4 Occupation. Table 4 shows that majority of the respondents’ occupation belong to student with 58 or 53. 21% followed by white collar job has which 18 or 16. 51%; blue and gold collar job has 15 or 13. 76%; and lastly red collar has with of 3 or 2. 75%. TABLE 4 Respondents’ Occupation Occupation F % Student 58 53. 21 White Collar Job (office employee, secretarial, administrative, clerical and managerial) 18 16. 51 Blue Collar Job (teachers, miners, construction, farmer, shop workers, factory workers, service workers, mechanical and maintenance) 15 13. 76 Gold Collar Job (engineers, doctors, lawyers) 15 13. 76 Red Collar Job (government workers) 3 2. 75 Total 109 100% 1. 5. Frequency Visit. Table 5 shows that majority of the respondents’ visit the parks yearly with 40 or 36. 76%; followed by monthly with 20 or 18. 34%; weekly with 16 or 14. 67%; quarterly with 15 or 13. 76%; semi-annually with 13 or 11. 92%; and everyday with 5 or 4. 58%. TABLE 5 Respondents’ Frequency of Visit Frequency of Visit F % Yearly 40 36. 76 Monthly 20 18. 34 Weekly 16 14. 67 Quarterly 15 13. 76 Semi-Annually 13 11. 92 Everyday 5 4. 58 Total 109 100% 1. 6. Purpose of Visit. Table 6 shows that majority of the respondents’ purpose of visit are excursion with 47 or 43. 11%; followed by business with 33 or 30. 27%; educational trip 16 or 14. 67%; and tour package inclusion with 13 or 11. 92%. TABLE 6 Respondents’ Purpose of Visit Purpose of Visit F % Excursion 47 43. 11 Family Bonding 33 30. 27 Educational Trip 16 14. 67 Tour Package Inclusion 13 11. 92 Total 109 100% 1. 7. Civil Status. Table 7 shows that majority of the respondents are single 72 out of 109 or 66. 05%, while 33 are married out of 109 or 30. 27%, and 1. 83% or 2 of the respondents are separated and widowed/widower. TABLE 7 Respondents’ Civil Status Civil Status F % Single 72 66. 05 Married 33 30. 27 Separated 2 1. 83 Widowed/Widower 2 1. 83 Total 109 100% 2. The Perceptions of the local and foreign tourists on the development of the new Rizal Park in terms of: 2. 1 Architectural Design. Table 8 shows that Rizal Park the respondents’ Strongly-Agreed on Rizal Park showcases the history and culture of the Philippines with of 4. 26. Most of the respondents believed that the Rizal Park are established to protect more recent records of human activity, in which special measures are taken to protect the features of historical interest. Subjects of the study â€Å"Agreed† on the following: Rizal Park is a portrait of strength of the Filipino having with of 4. 16; The Park is a blueprint of structural variations with of 0. 35; and the Rizal Park is a representation of uniqueness with of 3. 85. TABLE 8 Respondents’ Perception on Rizal Park’s Architectural Design 2. 1 Architecture Design SD VI 2. 1 Rizal Park is a portrait of strength of the Filipino 4. 16 0. 33 Agree 2. 2 The park is a representation of uniqueness 3. 85 0. 33 Agree 2. 3 It showcase the history and culture of the Philippines 4. 26 0. 41 Strongly-Agree 2. 4 It is a blueprint of structural variations 3. 98 0. 41 Agree Total 4. 06 0. 37 Agree 2. 2 Facilities. Table 9 shows the perceptions of the respondents on the facilities of Rizal Park. The subjects of the study â€Å"Strongly-Agreed† that the park is applicable for all ages with of 4. 26. They, also â€Å"Agreed† on the following: the Rizal Park has sufficient amount of chairs and tables with of 4. 16. The park is an evidence of the creativity of Filipinos which got with of 3. 98.